Affiliation:
1. Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University Osaka Japan
2. Graduate School of Economics Kobe University Kobe Japan
3. Faulty of Economics Kyoto Sangyo University Kyoto Japan
Abstract
AbstractPersonalized pricing has become a reality through digitization. We examine firms' incentives to adopt one of the three pricing schemes: uniform, personalized, or group pricing in a Hotelling duopoly model. There are two types of consumer groups that are heterogeneous in their mismatch costs. We show that both firms employ personalized pricing in equilibrium regardless of the heterogeneity of consumer groups. If the consumer groups' heterogeneity is significant, the profits are higher when both firms use personalized pricing than when they employ uniform pricing; otherwise, the latter profits are higher than the former. Profits are highest when firms employ group pricing among the three cases. The ranking of consumer welfare among the three cases is opposite to that of profits.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference28 articles.
1. Recent Developments in the Economics of Price Discrimination
2. Coupons and oligopolistic price discrimination
3. Bloomberg. (2017).Uber starts charging what it thinks you’re willing to pay.https://www.bloombergquint.com/markets/uber-s-future-may-rely-on-predicting-how-much-you-re-willing-to-pay(Last access: 24 August 2023).
4. Competitive Personalized Pricing
5. Pricing with Cookies: Behavior-Based Price Discrimination and Spatial Competition
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献