Applying statistics to the gatekeeping of expert evidence: Introducing the Structured Statistical Judgement (SSJ)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Applying statistics to the gatekeeping of expert evidence: Introducing the Structured Statistical Judgement (SSJ)

Published:2019-03 Issue:2 Volume:37 Page:133-144
ISSN:0735-3936
Container-title:Behavioral Sciences & the Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav Sci Law

Author:

Andretta James R.¹,Morgan Grant B.²,Cantone Jason A.³,Renbarger Rachel L.²

Affiliation:

1. Child Guidance ClinicSuperior Court of the District of Columbia Washington DC USA

2. Department of Educational PsychologyBaylor School of Education, Baylor University Waco TX USA

3. Department of Criminology, Law, and SocietyGeorge Mason University Fairfax VA USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bsl.2405

Reference30 articles.

1. Andretta J. R.(2015).Determining sufficient fact or data in legal testimony: A demonstration using power analysis. American Psychology‐Law Society Fall Newsletter. Retrieved fromhttp://ap‐ls.wildapricot.org/Newsletter/

2. The Effects of Stigma Priming on Forensic Screening in African American Youth

3. Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?

4. Evidence-based practice in psychology.

5. Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The use of statistics in criminal cases: An introduction;Behavioral Sciences & the Law;2019-03