General practitioners' and community pharmacists' beliefs and practices on opioids for non‐malignant pain

Author:

Jansen‐Groot Koerkamp E. A. W.12ORCID,Weesie Y. M.3,Heringa M.1ORCID,Hek K.3ORCID,Blom J. W.4ORCID,Numans M. E.4ORCID,van Dijk L.35ORCID,Bouvy M. L.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy Leiden The Netherlands

2. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

3. Pharmaceutical Care, Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht The Netherlands

4. Department Public Health and Primary Care of the Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

5. Department of PharmacoTherapy, ‐Epidemiology & ‐Economics (PTEE), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn Europe, opioid use has surged, largely due to prescriptions for chronic non‐malignant pain (CNMP). General practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) play a major role in opioid prescribing for non‐malignant pain. Exploring their personal beliefs and practices might reveal underlying mechanisms to identify measures that could halt the further escalation of opioid use.MethodsGuided by the health belief model, a survey was designed and distributed nationwide to examine the practices and beliefs of GPs and CPs in the domains: threats, benefits, barriers and self‐efficacy. The results of GPs and CPs were compared at the statement level using chi‐square analysis.ResultsOf 214 GPs and 212 CPs who completed the survey, the majority agreed that too many opioids are used in the treatment of chronic non‐malignant pain (66.8% GPs and 66.5% CPs). Furthermore, they were concerned about the addictive potential of opioids (83.1% GPs and 71.7% CPs). In general, both professions have concerns about opioid use. GPs report a slightly higher degree of self‐efficacy and perceive fewer benefits from opioids in treating CNMP. GPs and CPs valued the recommended measures to reduce opioid prescribing, yet less than half actively implement these strategies in their clinics.ConclusionGPs and CPs believe that opioids are being used too frequently to treat CNMP. However, both professions lack the actions to improve opioid‐related care. GPs and CPs require education, collaboration and tools to implement guidelines on non‐malignant pain and opioids.SignificanceThis study, guided by the health belief model, reveals that general practitioners and community pharmacists have serious concerns about opioid use in chronic non‐malignant pain. Despite shared concerns, both professions differ in their beliefs about opioid benefits and perceived self‐efficacy. Both professions have in common that they value recommended measures to reduce opioid prescribing. Also, they both struggle to implement strategies, emphasizing the urgent need for education, collaboration and tools to align practices with guidelines on non‐malignant pain and opioids.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3