Evaluating a dental sleep apnea mini‐residency program using the Kirkpatrick model

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate a Dental Sleep Medicine Mini‐Residency (DSMMR) continuing education (CE) program using the Kirkpatrick model.MethodsAfter receiving ethical approval, data from participants in the 2019–2020 DSMMR CE course were included for the Kirkpatrick evaluation. The analysis was stratified and all the Kirkpatrick levels were integrated: level 1 (satisfaction) was assessed via Likert scale and open‐ended questions; level 2 (learning) was evaluated using pretest and posttest knowledge data following Module 1 (M1) and an assessment of multiple‐choice questions (MCQs) developed by participants; level 3 (behavior) was evaluated using Likert scale questions; and level 4 (results) was assessed via the percentage of participants who passed the American Board of Dental Sleep Medicine (ABDSM) examination on their first attempt.ResultsA total of 90 participants were included in the study. At least 83.1% of participants agreed/strongly agreed with positively worded statements about satisfaction. Knowledge scores significantly increased from pre‐M1 to post‐M1 (p < 0.001); however, only 15.2% of MCQs were evaluated as well‐formulated. At least 88.6% of participants agreed/strongly agreed with positively worded statements about transfer of knowledge/skills to their practice. 91.1% passed the ABDSM examination on their first attempt.ConclusionThe evaluation of the 2019–2020 DSMMR using the Kirkpatrick model suggests its overall positive impact as a training program. The Kirkpatrick model provided information that can be used to improve the quality of a program. Future studies should assess other dental CE programs using the Kirkpatrick model or another evaluation model.