Clinical evaluation on the use of a new accessory device for Fox plane

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveEvaluate the assimilation capacity and ease of handling of the Fox plane accessory by dentistry students, through a questionnaire about the experience in using this device compared to the conventional one. Its intention is to minimize possible interpretation errors and challenges that the traditional method determines.MethodsAfter approval by the Research Ethics Committee, registration at Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Ética em Pesquisa/National Information System on Research Ethics (SISNEP) and signing of the free and informed consent form, 51 undergraduate students treating patients in need of complete dentures at Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia/Institute of Science and Technology (ICT) Unesp in São José dos Campos completed a questionnaire to evaluate the technical ease of use and provider acceptance. The obtained data were submitted to statistical analysis, evaluating technical ease and acceptance by operators.ResultsThe results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using the Jamovi 2.2.5 software. From the responses, the frequency was obtained for each question in the questionnaire, then the weighted mean was calculated, average rating and percentage. With the results of these analyses it was possible to measure the level of satisfaction of the participants in relation to the use of the device.ConclusionIt was concluded that most students have difficulty using the conventional Fox plane and that the accessory facilitated the process of determining the superior orientation plane, and its ease of use.