Artificial intelligence‐based assessment of leg axis parameters shows excellent agreement with human raters: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis on the reliability and applicability of artificial intelligence (AI)‐based analysis of leg axis parameters. We hypothesized that AI‐based leg axis measurements would be less time‐consuming and as accurate as those performed by human raters.MethodsThe study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). PubMed, Epistemonikos, and Web of Science were searched up to 24 February 2024, using a BOOLEAN search strategy. Titles and abstracts of identified records were screened through a stepwise process. Data extraction and quality assessment of the included papers were followed by a frequentist meta‐analysis employing a common effect/random effects model with inverse variance and the Sidik–Jonkman heterogeneity estimator.ResultsA total of 13 studies encompassing 3192 patients were included in this meta‐analysis. All studies compared AI‐based leg axis measurements on long‐leg radiographs (LLR) with those performed by human raters. The parameters hip knee ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint‐line convergence angle (JLCA) showed excellent agreement between AI and human raters. The AI system was approximately 3 min faster in reading standing long‐leg anteroposterior radiographs (LLRs) compared with human raters.ConclusionAI‐based assessment of leg axis parameters is an efficient, accurate, and time‐saving procedure. The quality of AI‐based assessment of the investigated parameters does not appear to be affected by the presence of implants or pathological conditions.Level of EvidenceLevel I.