Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A national mixed‐method survey study

Author:

Soukup Tayana1ORCID,Winters David2,Chua Kia‐Chong1,Rowland Philip3,Moneke Jacqueline3,Skolarus Ted A.4,Bharathan Rasiah5,Harling Leanne67,Bali Anish8,Asher Viren8,Gandamihardja Tasha9,Sevdalis Nick1,Green James S. A.2,Lamb Benjamin W.21011

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department King's College London London UK

2. Department of Urology Barts Health NHS Trust London UK

3. Department of Urology Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust London UK

4. Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology University of Michigan, Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester UK

6. Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK

7. School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Science Kings College London London UK

8. Gynaecology Cancer Centre University Hospitals of Derby & Burton Derby UK

9. Chelmsford Breast Unit Broomfield Hospital Chelmsford UK

10. Bart’s Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK

11. Department of Urology University London College Hospitals London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIt is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision‐making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically.MethodsThis was a mixed method, prospective cross‐sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021.ResultsThe participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID‐19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT‐related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID‐19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = −5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = −4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings.DiscussionOur study explored the perception of change since COVID‐19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further ‘live’ assessments of MDT meetings.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Diabetes UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3