Conflict between parents, physicians, and healthcare professionals in medical decision‐making: How to address it—A systematic review from the ESPGHAN Ethics Committee

Author:

Roggero Paola1,Grima Anne‐Marie23,Crespo‐Escobar Paula45,Tapsas Dimitrios6,Yahav Jacob7

Affiliation:

1. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS “Ca’ Granda” Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy

2. Department of Child and Adolescent Health Mater Dei Hospital L‐iMsida Malta

3. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Malta L‐iMsida Malta

4. i+HeALTH Strategic Research Group. Department of Health Science Miguel de Cervantes European University Valladolid Spain

5. Nutrition and Obesity Unit Hospital Recoletas Campo Grande Valladolid Spain

6. School of Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

7. The Hebrew University and Hadassah Medical School Jerusalem Israel

Abstract

AbstractMedical decisions about pediatric gastroenterology pathologies often involve collaboration between the medical team and the family. On occasions, conflict may arise between the individuals involved in decision making (team–family conflict) causing delays in managing a child's health condition. Little is known on the strategies that can be implemented to address such conflicts. Using the systematic review model by McCullough et al., an electronic literature search was conducted using PUBMED databases and SCOPUS. Studies published between 2001 and 2022 were analyzed to identify high‐risk families, the barriers and facilitators involved in the team–family conflict and the circumstances in which healthcare professionals can be ethically justified to override parents' medical decisions and to trigger the state intervention. The present review provides recommendations on the more suitable ways to manage team–family conflict and gives a practical approach using a case vignette.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention

2. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case

3. Models for Ethical Medicine in a Revolutionary Age

4. Self‐determination, healthcare treatment and minors in Italian clinical practice: ethical, psychological, juridical and medical‐legal profiles;Ciliberti R;Acta Bio‐Medica: Atenei Parmensis,2018

5. Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3