Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey

Author:

Zelano Johan123ORCID,Beniczky Sandor456ORCID,Ryvlin Philippe7ORCID,Surges Rainer8ORCID,Tomson Torbjörn9ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

2. Department of Neurology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

3. Wallenberg Center of Molecular and Translational Medicine University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Danish Epilepsy Center Dianalund Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

6. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhusm Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Neurosciences Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) Lausanne Switzerland

8. Department of Epileptology University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany

9. Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

AbstractWearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence‐based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic–clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guidelines and clinical practices at national level. We conducted a survey of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) chapters regarding national recommendations and practical circumstances for prescribing seizure detection devices, and another survey of physicians in the ILAE constituency anywhere in the world, concerning their views and practices regarding recommendations for and prescription of such devices. Fifty‐eight ILAE chapters (response rate 48%) and 157 physicians completed the surveys. More than two‐thirds of responding countries do not have standards on wearables for seizure detection, although they indicated availability of such devices. The most often recognized indications were safety and objective seizure quantification. In nearly half of countries, devices are purchased by patients or caregivers, and either lack a uniform reimbursement scheme (41%) or patients pay the full cost for the device (48%). Tonic–clonic seizure frequency, nocturnal seizures, and previous injuries were the main factors that influenced the surveyed physicians to recommend wearable seizure detection devices. Our results document the need to implement international clinical practice guidelines at national level and to consider these when deciding upon reimbursement of seizure detection devices.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3