Status of epilepsy care delivery and referral in clinics, hospitals, and epilepsy centers in Japan: A nationwide survey

Author:

Tokumoto Kentaro1ORCID,Terada Kiyohito12ORCID,Kawaguchi Norihiko1ORCID,Nishida Takuji1ORCID,Yamano Mitsuhiko34,Aoyagi Tomoo5,Tadokoro Yuji6,Usui Naotaka1ORCID,Inoue Yushi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Epilepsy Center National Hospital Organization Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders Shizuoka Japan

2. Yokohama Minoru Epilepsy and Developmental Clinic Yokohama Kanagawa Japan

3. Department of General Medicine Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan

4. Department of Neurology Tokai University Hospital Isehara Kanagawa Japan

5. Cocorport Consultation Support Room in Kawasaki Business Division of Comprehensive Support Cocorport Incorporated Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan

6. Japan Epilepsy Association Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveCollaboration among medical facilities is crucial to deliver comprehensive epilepsy care to a diverse and large population of people with epilepsy. We conducted a survey among medical facilities of various sizes throughout Japan to investigate the status of epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral.MethodsWith the cooperation of the Japan Neurological Society (1428 facilities), Japanese Neurosurgical Society (3489 specialists), and Epilepsy Care Network (948 facilities), a questionnaire was mailed to 5865 locations that provide epilepsy care in Japan. The facilities were classified into clinics (19 beds or less), small hospitals (SH, 20–199 beds), large hospitals (LH, 200 beds or more), and epilepsy centers (EC). The status of epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral was compared among the four groups.ResultsResponses were received from 1014 facilities (17.3% response rate). After excluding duplicate responses, 957 facilities were analyzed (394 clinics, 149 SH, 388 LH, 26 EC). EC responded “manageable” in more items of epilepsy care functions in general, especially those related to epilepsy surgery, compared to LH with similar facility size. However, EC responded being less manageable in psychiatric service (61.5%), dietary therapy (46.2%), rehabilitation (53.8%), and patient employment support (61.5%). The percentage of facilities that responded “always able to refer” was highest in clinics (67.6%) and the lowest in EC (40%). Referral difficulties were more commonly encountered in EC, and less common in clinics. In EC, the most common reason for inability to refer was patient or family refusal (64%).SignificanceWe have clarified the epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral in facilities of various sizes in Japan. This study highlights the issues of downward referral and patient stagnation in EC, which have not received much attention.Plain Language SummaryA nationwide survey of healthcare facilities ranging in size from small clinics to large hospitals in Japan examined medical care delivery and patient referrals related to epilepsy. Compared to other facilities, epilepsy centers provided a variety of medical services to people with epilepsy but were inadequate in addressing psychiatric symptoms, providing dietary therapy, rehabilitation, and patient employment support. Referrals from epilepsy centers to other medical facilities were often refused by patients and their families. This results in patient crowding at epilepsy centers

Funder

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3