Affiliation:
1. King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia
2. Research Department MED‐EL GmbH Riyadh Saudi Arabia
3. Audiology Unit, ENT Department Menoufia University Menoufia Egypt
4. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery College of Medicine, Jouf University Sakaka Saudi Arabia
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different management strategies used for reducing and resolving FNS.Data SourceWeb of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) of the World Health Organization (WHO).Review MethodsA systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) on studies that reported FNS as a complication after CI. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was used to identify the relevant articles. We extracted the data on the prevalence of FNS after CI activation, the reported grades, and the management strategies. The number of associated electrodes; cause of deafness; co‐anomalies; and duration of hearing loss and their relationships with FNS were also studied.ResultsTwenty‐one relevant articles were included in this review. The prevalence of FNS among the CI populations was 5.29% (175/3306 patients). Among those whose ages were reported, 58.3% (95/163) were adults, and 41.7% (68/163) were pediatrics. Modifying the different fitting parameters was the most used strategy, as it successfully resolved FNS in 85.5% of the patients (142/166). The second commonly used management strategy was surgical intervention (reimplantation or explantation), which was reported in seven studies for 23 patients.ConclusionFNS after CI activation could be controlled and resolved with many advances that range from readjusting the fitting parameters to surgical intervention. However, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of each management strategy and its impact on patients' performance. Our findings demonstrate that CI recipients with FNS could still benefit from the CI devices and their FNS could be controlled.
Reference40 articles.
1. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation: our experience;Berrettini S;Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2011
2. Facial nerve stimulation after Nucleus 22‐channel cochlear implantation;Kelsall DC;Am J Otol,1997
3. Facial Nerve Stimulation with Cochlear Implantation
4. Facial Nerve Stimulation after Cochlear Implantation
5. Resolution of Facial Stimulation in Otosclerotic Cochlear Implants
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献