Keep it simple: Information sources students use when choosing school psychology programs

Author:

Aspiranti Kathleen B.1ORCID,Hulac David M.2ORCID,Blake Jessica1

Affiliation:

1. University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

2. University of Northern Colorado Greeley Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractThose tasked with recruiting students to school psychology programs have limited resources. Yet, they need to identify which sources of information prospective students will use to inform their choice of school psychology programs. A survey was developed to measure which information sources school psychology students consider when applying to graduate programs and to determine which demographic factors contribute to the types of information used. The survey was administered via email and completed by 406 current school psychology students. An exploratory factor analysis found three factors related to General Information, Program Details, and Student Outreach. Overall, students highlighted the importance of general information that is available on the website. Student outreach efforts were less preferred, though students did value the opportunities to talk with faculty members such as the program coordinator. Effects of race, gender, first‐generation status, and in‐state status were not significantly related to student information preferences. Results suggest that programs should consider creating high‐quality program, departmental, and university websites as the most effective way to provide information to prospective students.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference28 articles.

1. National Association of School Psychologists. (n.d.) The NASP Exposure Project.https://www.nasponline.org/resources-and-publications/resources-and-podcasts/diversity-and-social-justice/cultural-competence/multicultural-affairs-committee/nasp-exposure-project-(nasp-ep)

2. Reputable and affordable programs with a strong commitment to diversity: Factors influencing school psychology student admission decisions.

3. The NASP Exposure Project: Using research in practice to advance strategic goals;Barrett C. A.;Communiqué (Milwaukee, Wis.),2020

4. Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3