Quality management and competencies in forensic science

Author:

Neuteboom Wim1,Ross Alastair2ORCID,Bugeja Lyndal3,Willis Sheila4ORCID,Roux Claude5,Lothridge Kevin6

Affiliation:

1. Netherlands Forensic Institute (Retired) The Hague Netherlands

2. Academic Programs Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Forensic Medicine School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science, University of Dundee Dundee Scotland UK

5. Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology, Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Global Forensic and Justice Centre, Florida International University Largo Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractThe competencies and attributes of forensic science professionals are a very important pillar of a Quality Management system. However, a recent international survey identified a lack of agreement on the core cognitive competencies required for working in forensic science. The survey also identified the tools for assessing competencies are not necessarily designed to measure cognitive competencies. In this Perspective, we explore further the topic of competencies and in particular, cognitive competencies and attributes with a focus on forensic science professionals. We identify the critical issue and outline a process through which we will seek the views of leaders in the field, both operational and academic, on what the required cognitive competencies and attributes are for forensic science professionals. The tools used will include a questionnaire and direct interviews. Having identified the key competencies and attributes they can then be promoted, and methods developed to assess them within the recruitment process and continuous professional development programs. We argue that further discussion on this topic is warranted as it impacts on forensic science education, training, recruitment, operations, and overall quality.This article is categorized under: Forensic Chemistry and Trace Evidence > Presentation and Evaluation of Forensic Science Output

Publisher

Wiley

Reference20 articles.

1. Ansari S.(2023).Traits vs competencies: the perplexing question.https://techrseries.com/performance-management/traits-vs-competencies-the-perplexing-question/

2. Competencies and Attributes

3. Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias

4. Edupedia. (n.d.).What are cognitive competencies.https://www.theedadvocate.org/edupedia/content/what-are-cognitive-competencies/

5. Eskafi F. H.(2016).Cognitive vs. non‐cognitive assessments: What are they?https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cognitive-vs-non-cognitive-assessments-what-farzad-h-eskafi

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3