Categorical versus dimensional structure of autism spectrum disorder: A multi‐method investigation

Author:

Frazier Thomas W.1ORCID,Chetcuti Lacey2ORCID,Al‐Shaban Fouad A.3,Haslam Nick4,Ghazal Iman3,Klingemier Eric W.5,Aldosari Mohammed6,Whitehouse Andrew J. O.7,Youngstrom Eric A.8,Hardan Antonio Y.9,Uljarević Mirko4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology John Carroll University University Heights Ohio USA

2. Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre School of Psychology and Public Health La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Neurological Disorders Research Center Qatar Biomedical Research Institute Hamad Bin Khalifa University Doha Qatar

4. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. Caregiver Experience Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

6. Neurological Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

7. Telethon Kids Institute University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

8. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

9. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Stanford University Stanford California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundA key question for any psychopathological diagnosis is whether the condition is continuous or discontinuous with typical variation. The primary objective of this study was to use a multi‐method approach to examine the broad latent categorical versus dimensional structure of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).MethodData were aggregated across seven independent samples of participants with ASD, other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), and non‐ASD/NDD controls (aggregate Ns = 512–16,755; ages 1.5–22). Scores from four distinct phenotype measures formed composite “indicators” of the latent ASD construct. The primary indicator set included eye gaze metrics from seven distinct social stimulus paradigms. Logistic regressions were used to combine gaze metrics within/across paradigms, and derived predicted probabilities served as indicator values. Secondary indicator sets were constructed from clinical observation and parent‐report measures of ASD symptoms. Indicator sets were submitted to taxometric‐ and latent class analyses.ResultsAcross all indicator sets and analytic methods, there was strong support for categorical structure corresponding closely to ASD diagnosis. Consistent with notions of substantial phenotypic heterogeneity, the ASD category had a wide range of symptom severity. Despite the examination of a large sample with a wide range of IQs in both genders, males and children with lower IQ were over‐represented in the ASD category, similar to observations in diagnosed cases.ConclusionsOur findings provide strong support for categorical structure corresponding closely to ASD diagnosis. The present results bolster the use of well‐diagnosed and representative ASD groups within etiologic and clinical research, motivating the ongoing search for major drivers of the ASD phenotype. Despite the categorical structure of ASD, quantitative symptom measurements appear more useful for examining relationships with other factors.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3