Accuracy of surgeons for predicting radiological sarcopenia in colorectal cancer surgery

Author:

Gonçalves Arthur Foinquinos Krause1ORCID,de Barros Ana Beatriz Diniz1ORCID,Castro Lucas Miranda2ORCID,Dutra Joanna Brayner2ORCID,Batista Thales Paulo3ORCID,Martins Antônio Cavalcanti de Almeida1ORCID,Mello Maria Julia Gonçalves4ORCID,Leão Cristiano de Souza1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP) Recife Brazil

2. Department of Radiology Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP) Recife Brazil

3. Department of Surgery Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Recife Brazil

4. Department of Clinical Research Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP) Recife Brazil

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study explored the performance of surgeons for predicting radiological sarcopenia as accessed by psoas cross‐sectional area in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA cross‐sectional study was carried out and a diagnostic accuracy strategy was applied using the radiologist team assessment as gold standard.ResultsCohort analysis of 45 consecutive patients found that 31.1% had sarcopenia. Correlation of Total Psoas Index between radiologists and surgeons was very strong for the Junior and strong for the Senior surgeon, with a strong correlation between the surgeons. By the simplistic criterion, agreement between radiologists and surgeons was substantial for both the Junior and Senior surgeons, with a moderate level between the surgeons. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of Junior surgeon were 92.9%, 83.9%, 72.2%, 96.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. The corresponding results for the Senior surgeon were 78.6%, 90.3%, 78.6%, 90.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. We found no major differences on agreement levels and performance of surgeons using the composite criterion.ConclusionsSurgeons seem to be accurate for identifying radiological sarcopenia in patients with CRC. The simplistic criterion should be preferred since a composite criterion adds complexity without increasing accuracy or agreement levels.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3