Tree removals as socioecological experiments in cities

Author:

Threlfall Caragh G12,Ordóñez‐Barona Camilo34,Livesley Stephen J3,Baumann Jess3,Callow David5,Davern Melanie67,English Alex8,Fuller Richard A9,Hertzog Kelly5,Hochuli Dieter F2,van der Ree Rodney1011,Kendal Dave12

Affiliation:

1. School of Natural Sciences, Smart Green Cities Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering Macquarie University Sydney Australia

2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Sydney Camperdown Australia

3. School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Burnley campus, Faculty of Science University of Melbourne Richmond Australia

4. Department of Geography Geomatics and Environment University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga, Canada

5. Parks and City Greening City of Melbourne Melbourne Australia

6. Health, Place and Society Centre for Urban Research, The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Melbourne Australia

7. Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne Parkville Australia

8. Open Space Merri‐bek City Council Coburg Australia

9. School of the Environment, University of Queensland St Lucia Australia

10. WSP Australia Pty Ltd Melbourne Australia

11. School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne Parkville Australia

12. Future in Nature Pty Ltd Black Hill Australia

Abstract

As keystone structures in urban ecosystems, trees are critical to addressing many of the current livability, health, and environmental challenges facing cities. Every day, trees are removed from urban landscapes as part of routine management. These tree removals are an opportunity for implementing manipulative experiments to directly measure the social and ecological functions of trees. Here we review the kinds of tree removals that commonly occur in cities, assess the relevant opportunities that arise for research–practice partnerships, and discuss the challenges posed when implementing experiments of this nature. We argue that experimental studies on the routine removal of urban trees will improve and expand the mechanistic understanding of how trees support biodiversity and human well‐being in cities beyond current knowledge, which is largely based on correlative studies. Finally, we highlight the opportunity for experiments to be co‐designed by scientists and urban land managers, and how “learning while doing” can generate tangible research impacts and improve urban forest decision making.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3