Renal function estimating equations performance during pregnancy and postpartum

Author:

Zaghloul Dina E.1ORCID,Ryu Rachel1,Kestenbaum Bryan2,Smith Chase1,Fay Emily3,Hebert Mary F.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Department of Nephrology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractStudy ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of renal function estimating equations compared to measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) during pregnancy and postpartum and to evaluate which body weight (pre‐pregnancy weight (PPW), actual body weight (ABW), and ideal body weight (IBW)) provides the best performance.DesignA retrospective study.SettingCollections tookplace in the University of Washington clinical research unit.PatientsWomen (n = 166) who completed ≥1 pharmacokinetic (PK) study with a 6–24 h measured CrCl during pregnancy and/or ≥3 months postpartum were included.InterventionCrCl was estimated utilizing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CrCl equations with common weight descriptors. Analyses included Bland–Altman, relative accuracies within 10% and 25%, and root mean squared error (RMSE). Overall performance was determined by summation of rank for evaluation parameters.Measurements and Main ResultsDuring pregnancy, correlations between measured CrCl and estimated CrCl were between 0.5–0.8; equations with slopes closest to one were Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD2; PPW and ABW) and Cockcroft‐Gault (CG) (PPW); and y‐intercept closest to zero was Preeclampsia Glomerular Filtration Rate (PGFR). The lowest bias was seen with CG (ABW), and the highest accuracy within 25% was CG (ABW). CG (PPW) had the lowest RMSE. Postpartum, the best correlation was found with MDRD2 (PPW), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD–EPI (ABW)), and CKD–EPI 2021 (PPW). For slopes closest to one, MDRD2 (ABW) was best, whereas the equation with y‐intercept closest to zero was CKD–EPI (ABW). CG (PPW) had the highest accuracy within 25%, and 100/serum creatinine (SCr) had the lowest bias. Based on overall performance, CG (PPW) was the best followed by CG (ABW) and PGFR during pregnancy and 100/SCr followed by CG (PPW) and CG (ABW) postpartum.ConclusionThe new CKD–EPI 2021 equation did not perform well during pregnancy. When 24‐h CrCls are not available during pregnancy, CG (PPW or ABW) performed the best overall, whereas at 3 months postpartum, 100/SCr performed the best overall.

Funder

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3