Affiliation:
1. School of Civic Leadership University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses the interactions between politics and economic ideas leading to the adoption of inflation targeting in the United States. In the gold standard era, farmers' vulnerability to falling prices made price‐level stabilization a salient political and social concern. Economists of the progressive era honed in on price‐level stabilization as a key to promoting prosperity and social justice. Irving Fisher, in alliance with farm interests, helped members of Congress introduce price‐level stabilization bills that, while unsuccessful, introduced the possibility that a price‐level stabilization mandate might be a viable alternative to a gold standard. In the postwar years, the Great Inflation and Volcker disinflation set the stage for the rise of inflation targeting by highlighting the benefits of credibility, transparency, and expectations management. Tensions inherent in the implementation of inflation targeting—including its position in the “rules versus discretion” debate—have become more pronounced since the post‐COVID run‐up in inflation.
Reference82 articles.
1. Why do banks fail? Evidence from the 1920s;Alson L.;Explorations in Economic History,1994
2. Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy
3. The demand for Divisia Money: Theory and evidence
4. Pioneering price level targeting: The Swedish experience 1931–1937
5. Bernanke B.(2005)Nomination hearing testimony before the Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs U.S. Senate 109th Congress. Retrieved fromhttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-109shrg26610/html/CHRG-109shrg26610.htm