A six‐year comprehensive review of eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOcular cytology is an effective method of diagnosing infective, benign, and malignant ocular disease processes due to easy accessibility and rapid turnaround time. However, these specimens pose significant diagnostic challenges due to rarity of the specimen type, sparse diagnostic material available for ancillary workup, and unfamiliarity of the diagnostic entities by the cytopathologist.MethodsThis study conducted a 6‐year comprehensive review of 65 eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital. Cytopathologic diagnoses of “negative for malignancy” and “atypical” were categorized as negative findings (70.8%, n = 46) and diagnoses of “suspicious for malignancy” and “positive for malignancy” were categorized as positive findings (23.1%, n = 15). A 44.6% (n = 29) of cases had subsequent histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses. Premalignant and malignant lesions detected on histopathology were considered as significant findings. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the concordance of ocular cytology with associated histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses.ResultsThe accuracy of final cytology‐histopathology and/or cytology‐flow cytometry diagnoses in this cohort of cases is 86.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 66.6% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 100% and 80.9%, respectively.ConclusionOcular cytology is a fast, effective, and sensitive method for diagnosing ocular pathology specimens. Familiarity with these specimen types by cytopathologists can help in diagnosing ocular diseases effectively on small, challenging cytologic preparations.