Validation of daily 0.35 T diffusion‐weighted MRI for MRI‐guided glioblastoma radiotherapy

Author:

Lutsik Natalia1,Nejad‐Davarani Siamak P.1,Valderrama Alessandro1,Herr Janette1,Maziero Danilo12,Cullison Kaylie1,Azzam Gregory A.1,Kubicek Gregory J1,Meshman Jessica1,de la Fuente Macarena I.3,Armstrong Tess4,Mellon Eric A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

2. Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences UC San Diego Health La Jolla California USA

3. Neuro‐Oncology division University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

4. Former ViewRay, Inc. Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMRI‐Linac systems enable daily diffusion‐weighed imaging (DWI) MRI scans for assessing glioblastoma tumor changes with radiotherapy treatment.PurposeOur study assessed the image quality of echoplanar imaging (EPI)‐DWI scans compared with turbo spin echo (TSE)‐DWI scans at 0.35 Tesla (T) and compared the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and distortion of EPI‐DWI on 0.35 T MRI‐Linac compared to high‐field diagnostic MRI scanners.MethodsThe calibrated National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Phantom was scanned on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, and 1.5 T and 3 T MRI with EPI‐DWI. Five patients were scanned on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac with a TSE‐DWI sequence, and five other patients were scanned with EPI‐DWI on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac and a 3 T MRI. The quality of images was compared between the TSE‐DWI and EPI‐DWI on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac assessing signal‐to‐noise ratios and presence of artifacts. EPI‐DWI ADC values and distortion magnitude were measured and compared between 0.35 T MRI‐Linac and high‐field MRI for both phantom and patient studies.ResultsThe average ADC differences between EPI‐DWI acquired on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners and published references in the phantom study were 1.7%, 0.4% and 1.0%, respectively. Comparing the ADC values based on EPI‐DWI in glioblastoma tumors, there was a 3.36% difference between 0.35 and 3 T measurements. Susceptibility‐induced distortions in the EPI‐DWI phantoms were 0.46 ± 1.51 mm for 0.35 MRI‐Linac, 0.98 ± 0.51 mm for 1.5 T MRI and 1.14 ± 1.88 mm for 3 T MRI; for patients ‐0.47 ± 0.78 mm for 0.35 T and 1.73 ± 2.11 mm for 3 T MRIs. The mean deformable registration distortion for a phantom was 1.1 ± 0.22 mm, 3.5 ± 0.39 mm and 4.7 ± 0.37 mm for the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, 1.5 T MRI, and 3 T MRI scanners, respectively; for patients this distortion was –0.46 ± 0.57 mm for 0.35 T and 4.2 ± 0.41 mm for 3 T. EPI‐DWI 0.35 T MRI‐Linac images showed higher SNR and lack of artifacts compared with TSE‐DWI, especially at higher b‐values up to 1000 s/mm2.ConclusionEPI‐DWI on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac showed superior image quality compared with TSE‐DWI, minor and less distortions than high‐field diagnostic scanners, and comparable ADC values in phantoms and glioblastoma tumors. EPI‐DWI should be investigated on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac for prediction of early response in patients with glioblastoma.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3