Causes and investigation of stillbirths in Brazil: A multicentre cross‐sectional study in 10 referral maternity hospitals

Author:

Brasileiro Mariana1,Metelus Sherly1,Griggio Thayna B.1,Vieira Matias C.12,Dias Marcos A. B.3,Leite Débora F.4,da Cunha Filho Edson V.5,Schreiner Lucas5,Ramos José Geraldo L.6,Haddad Samira M.7,Osanan Gabriel8,Mayrink Jussara8,de Jesús Guilherme R.9,Fernandes Karayna G.10,Pasupathy Dharmintra211,Cecatti José G.1,Souza Renato T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Medical Sciences Campinas Brazil

2. Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London Women's Health Academic Centre KHP London UK

3. Fernandes Figueira Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation/FIOCRUZ Rio de Janeiro Brazil

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Federal University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, São Lucas Hospital, School of Medicine Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

6. Clinics Hospital of Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil

7. Jorge Rossmann Regional Hospital—Sócrates Guanaes Institute Itanhaém Brazil

8. Federal University of Minas Gerais—HC/UFMG Belo Horizonte Brazil

9. Department of Obstetrics University Hospital Pedro Ernesto—Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

10. Jundiaí School of Medicine—HU/FMJ Jundiaí Brazil

11. Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Camperdown New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveUnderstanding the local characteristics and statistics related to stillbirths may be the first step in a series of strategies associated with a reduction in stillbirth ratio. The aim of this study was to estimate the fetal mortality ratio and evaluate the investigation processes related to the causes of death, comparing the investigation according to the specific cause of death.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was retrospectively conducted in 10 tertiary obstetric care centers. Medical records of women with stillbirth managed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 were analyzed and classified, according to sociodemographic characteristics, and gestational and childbirth data, culminating in stillbirth. The stillbirth ratio and its causes were presented in proportions for the study period and individually for each health facility.ResultsCases of 3390 stillbirths were analyzed. The stillbirth ratio varied from 10.74/1000 live births (LBs) in 2009 to 9.31/1000 in 2018. “Intrauterine hypoxia and asphyxia” (ICD‐10 P20) and “unspecific causes of death” (ICD‐10 P95) represented 40.8% of the causes of death. Investigation for TORCHS and diabetes occurred in 90.8% and 61.4% of deaths, respectively. Placental and necroscopic tests were performed in 36.6% of the cases.ConclusionThe adoption of a rational and standardized investigation of stillbirth remains an unmet need; the use of additional tests and examinations are lacking, especially when unspecific causes are attributed.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3