Monte Carlo‐derived 99mTc uptake quantification with commercial planar MBI: Tumor and breast activity concentrations

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCurrent molecular breast imaging (MBI) images are limited to qualitative evaluation, not absolute measurement, of 99mTc uptake in benign and malignant breast tissues.PurposeThis work assesses the accuracy of previously‐published and newly‐proposed tumor and normal breast tissue 99mTc uptake MBI measurements using simulations of a commercial dual‐headed planar MBI system under typical clinical and acquisition protocols.MethodsQuantification techniques were tested in over 4000 simulated acquisitions of spherical and ellipsoid tumors with clinically relevant uptake conditions using a validated Monte Carlo application of the GE Discovery NM750b system. The evaluated techniques consisted of four tumor total activity methodologies (two single‐detector‐based and two geometric‐mean‐based), two tumor MBI volume methodologies (diameter‐based and ROI‐based), and two normal tissue activity concentration methodologies (single‐detector‐based and geometric‐mean‐based). The most accurate of these techniques were then used to estimate tumor activity concentrations and tumor to normal tissue relative activity concentrations (RC).ResultsSingle‐detector techniques for tumor total activity quantification achieved mean (standard deviation) relative errors of 0.2% (4.3%) and 1.6% (4.4%) when using the near and far detector images, respectively and were more accurate and precise than the measured 8.1% (5.8%) errors of a previously published geometric‐mean technique. Using these activity estimates and the true tumor volumes resulted in tumor activity concentration and RC errors within 10% of simulated values. The precision of tumor activity concentration and RC when using only MBI measurements were largely driven by the errors in estimating tumor MBI volume using planar images (± 30% inter‐quartile range).ConclusionsPlanar MBI images were shown to accurately and reliably be used to estimate tumor total activities and normal tissue activity concentrations in this simulation study. However, volumetric tumor uptake measurements (i.e., absolute and relative concentrations) are limited by inaccuracies in MBI volume estimation using two‐dimensional images, highlighting the need for either tomographic MBI acquisitions or anatomical volume estimates for accurate three‐dimensional tumor uptake estimates.