DEBTACE versus cTACE for unresectable HCC with B1‐type bile duct invasion after successful biliary drainage: A propensity score matching analysis

Author:

Fan Wenzhe1,Zheng Xinlin1,Zhao Xiao2,Zhu Bowen1ORCID,Wu Yanqin1,Xue Miao1,Tang Rong3,Huang Zhen4,Qiao Liangliang5,Lu Mingjian6,Tang Yiyang1,Wu Jian7,Li Jiaping1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Interventional Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

2. Cancer Center The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

3. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Hainan General Hospital Haikou China

4. Department of Interventional Angiology Huizhou First People's Hospital Huizhou China

5. Department of Interventional Oncology Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Guangzhou China

6. Department of Radiology Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou China

7. Center of Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the lack of specific recommendations for conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug‐eluting bead TACE (DEB‐TACE) in patients having unresectable HCC with tumor infiltrating the common hepatic duct or the first‐order branch of the bile ducts (B1‐type bile duct invasion; B1‐BDI) after biliary drainage, we retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of DEB‐TACE with cTACE in this patient population.Materials and MethodsUsing data from five tertiary medical centers (January 2017–December 2021), we compared complications, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate between patients having unresectable HCC with B1‐BDI who underwent DEB‐TACE or cTACE after successful biliary drainage. X‐tile software calculated the pre‐TACE total bilirubin (TBil) cutoff value, indicating optimal timing for sequential TACE after drainage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.ResultsThe study included 108 patients with unresectable HCC (B1‐BDI) who underwent DEB‐TACE and 114 who received cTACE as initial treatment. After PSM (n = 53 for each group), the DEB‐TACE group had a longer TTP (8.9 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.038) and higher objective response rate (64.2% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.011) than did the cTACE group, although OS was comparable (16.7 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.115). The DEB‐TACE group exhibited fewer post‐procedural increments in the mean albumin‐bilirubin score, TBil, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), along with a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days (hepatic failure, ALT increase, and TBil increase) than the cTACE group (all p < 0.05). The pre‐TACE TBil cutoff value was 99 μmol/L; patients with higher values (>99 μmol/L) had poorer OS in both groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionDEB‐TACE is safe and effective after successful biliary drainage in unresectable HCC with B1‐BDI, potentially better than cTACE in terms of liver toxicity, TTP, and ORR. Lowering TBil below 99 μmol/L through successful drainage may create ideal conditions for sequential TACE.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3