Affiliation:
1. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
2. Memory and Aging Center Department of Neurology University of California San Francisco California USA
Abstract
AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe history of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is both old and new. This study explores its historical roots, dating back to the 19th century, while recognizes it as a distinct neurological entity only a few decades ago.METHODSThis qualitative study and literature review provides an overview of FTD's historical background, birth, evolution, and future directions.RESULTSRecognition of FTD was hindered by rigid perceptions of dementia, the division between neurology and psychiatry, reliance on IQ‐based assessment, limited neuroimaging capabilities, and lack of pathological proof. Overcoming these barriers involved revisiting early pioneers' approaches, focusing on focal impairment, establishing non‐Alzheimer's disease cohorts, fostering collaboration, and developing diagnostic criteria. Current gaps include the need for biology‐oriented psychiatry education, biological biomarkers, and culturally sensitive, objective clinical instruments predicting underlying pathology.DISCUSSIONIndependent multidisciplinary centers are essential. The future of FTD lies in disease‐modifying therapies, presenting new opportunities for healthcare professionals and researchers.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献