Comparison of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma treated nonsurgically and proposal of a new stage grouping system

Author:

Zheng Aihong1,Wang Yiwen2,Li Shuang34,Wang Yingjie5,Xu Hong'en3ORCID,Ding Jieni3,Chen Bingchen6,Song Tao35ORCID,Lai Lei5

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College Hangzhou People's Republic of China

2. Department of Clinical Medical Engineering The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou People's Republic of China

3. Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College Hangzhou People's Republic of China

4. Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Jinzhou Medical University Jinzhou People's Republic of China

5. Department of Oncology Tongxiang First People's Hospital Jiaxing People's Republic of China

6. Department of General Surgery, Cancer Center, Division of Colorectal Surgery Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College Hangzhou People's Republic of China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the survival discrimination of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated nonsurgically and suggest a simple revised staging system with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsOverall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Survival comparisons between the T and N stages and the different staging systems were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test, followed by correlation analysis and variable importance analysis (VIA). Additionally, multivariate analysis was employed to identify significant predictors, which were further visualized using a nomogram. Finally, calibration curve, C‐index, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the performance of the different staging systems.ResultsA total of 5384 patients with ASCC were analyzed, revealing superior discrimination OS by the TNM9th edition compared to that by the TNM8th edition. Multivariate analysis identified the T and N stages as significant OS predictors (all p < 0.001). However, ambiguity persisted in stage III subgroups within the TNM9th edition, showing OS times of 102 months for stage IIIA disease, 88 months for stage IIIB disease, and 128 months for stage IIIC disease (all p > 0.05). Correlation analysis demonstrated an increased correlation for the T stage between the TNM8th and 9th editions (ρ value from 0.7 to 0.89), while the N stage correlation decreased (ρ value from 0.84 to 0.56). VIA and the prognostic nomogram highlighted the greater importance of the T stage over the N stage. Based on these findings, a new staging system was developed, and its clinical utility was confirmed through calibration curves, C‐index values (from 0.598 to 0.604), and DCAs.ConclusionsOur new staging system exhibited slightly better prognostic value compared to the TNM9th staging systems for nonmetastatic ASCC and warrants further validation.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3