Measurement invariance of the Facebook intrusion questionnaire across 25 countries

Author:

Błachnio Agata1ORCID,Przepiórka Aneta1ORCID,Gorbaniuk Oleg23,Abreu Ana Maria4ORCID,Bendayan Rebecca56,Ben‐Ezra Menachem7,Benvenuti Martina8,Durak Mithat9,Senol‐Durak Emre9,Makita Meiko10,McNeill Monika11,Seidman Gwendolyn12,Wu Anise M.S.13,Blanca Maria J.5,Angeluci Alan14ORCID,Čuš Babić Nenad15,Brkljacic Tihana16,Ciobanu Adela Magdalena17ORCID,Ivanova Ana1,Giannakos Michail N.18,Gorbaniuk Julia13,Holdoš Juraj19,Malik Sadia20,Mahmoud Ali Bassam21ORCID,Milanovic Anita22,Musil Bojan15,Pappas Ilias O.18,Popa Camelia23,Pantic Igor2425,Rando Belen26,D'Souza Lancy27,Wołonciej Mariusz1,Vanden Abeele Mariek M. P.2829,Yafi Eiad30,Yu Shu M.31,Elphinston Rachel A.32333435,Mazzoni Elvis8

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin Lublin Poland

2. Institute of Psychology Maria Curie‐Skłodowska University Lublin Poland

3. Department of Psychology Casimir Pulaski University of Radom Radom Poland

4. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS) Universidade Católica Portuguesa Lisbon Portugal

5. University of Malaga Malaga Spain

6. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

7. Ariel University Ariel Israel

8. Institute of Psychology University of Bologna Bologna Italy

9. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Department of Psychology Bolu Turkey

10. Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group University of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton UK

11. Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK

12. Albright College Reading PA USA

13. Department of Psychology / Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences University of Macau Macao China

14. Institute of Psychology University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

15. Institute of Psychology University of Maribor Maribor Slovenia

16. Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar Zagreb Croatia

17. University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest Romania

18. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway

19. Department of Psychology Catholic University in Ruzomberok Slovakia

20. Department of Psychology University of Sargodha Punjab Pakistan

21. St John's University The Peter J Tobin College of Business New York NY USA

22. Clinic for Mental Disorders “Dr Laza Lazarević” Belgrade Serbia

23. Romanian Academy, “Constantin Rădulescu‐Motru” Institute of Philosophy and Psychology, UNATC Bucharest Romania

24. University of Belgrade Serbia

25. University of Haifa Haifa Israel

26. Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

27. Department of Psychology University of Mysore Mysore India

28. Institute of Psychology University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

29. Institute of Psychology University of Tilburg Tiburg The Netherlands

30. Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

31. Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming University of Gibraltar Gibraltar

32. Recover Injury Research Centre The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia

33. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia

34. School of Psychology The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia

35. Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Hospital and Health Service Brisbane QLD Australia

Abstract

Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites. However, Facebook intrusion or addiction is a growing concern as it involves an excessive attachment to Facebook, which disrupts daily functioning. To date, few studies have examined whether cross‐cultural differences in the measurement of Facebook addiction exist. The aim of this study was to investigate the cross‐cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ), one of the most widely used measures of Facebook addiction, across 25 countries (N = 12,204, 62.3% female; mean age = 25 years). Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) assessed cross‐cultural validity as well as invariance. Additionally, individual confirmatory factor analyses evaluated the factorial structure and measurement invariance across genders in each country. The FIQ demonstrated partial metric invariance across countries and metric (13 countries), scalar (11 countries) or residual (10 countries) invariance across genders within individual countries. A one‐factor model indicated a good fit in 18 countries. Cronbach's alpha for the entire sample was .85. Our findings suggest that the FIQ may provide an adequate assessment of Facebook addiction that is psychometrically equivalent across cultures. Moreover, the questionnaire seems to be universal and suitable for studying different social media in distinct cultural environments. Consequently, this robust tool can be used to explore behaviours related to specific media that are particularly popular in any given country.

Funder

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3