Performance of QUiPP App v.2 tool for prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic high‐risk women attending preterm specialist clinic: external validation study

Author:

Creswell L.1ORCID,Rolnik D. L.2ORCID,Burke B.1,Daly S.1,O'Gorman N.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The Coombe Hospital Dublin Ireland

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Monash University Melbourne Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo validate externally the QUiPP App v.2 algorithms in an independent cohort of high‐risk asymptomatic women attending a preterm birth (PTB) surveillance clinic in Ireland.MethodsThis was a retrospective, single‐center, observational study assessing discrimination and calibration of the QUiPP App v.2 at six predetermined clinical timepoints (PTB at < 30, < 34 and < 37 weeks of pregnancy and PTB within 1, 2 and 4 weeks of testing). Discrimination was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve (AUC) and sensitivity at fixed false‐positive rates of 5%, 10% and 20%. Model calibration was assessed to evaluate the concordance between expected and observed outcomes. P‐values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. No adjustments for treatment effects were made.ResultsOverall, 762 women with 1660 PTB surveillance clinic visits using the QUiPP App v.2 between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed. The study population included 142 (18.6%) patients who later experienced PTB. The QuiPP App's performance in the prediction of short‐term outcomes, such as birth within 1 week (AUC, 0.866 (95% CI, 0.755–0.955)), 2 weeks (AUC, 0.721 (95% CI, 0.569–0.854)) and 4 weeks (AUC, 0.775 (95% CI, 0.699–0.842)), and delivery at < 30 weeks (AUC, 0.747 (95% CI, 0.613–0.865)), was superior to its ability to predict longer‐term outcomes (PTB at < 37 weeks: AUC, 0.631 (95% CI, 0.596–0.668)). Calibration was generally good for low‐risk results, as the predicted risk in these patients tended to match the observed incidence. However, in women deemed to be at greater risk of PTB, the predicted probability superseded the observed incidence of PTB.ConclusionsThe QUiPP App v.2 accurately discriminates women who are at short‐term risk of PTB. A ‘treatment paradox’ may influence calibration in high‐risk women. Further research is needed to ascertain if QuiPP treatment thresholds can be safely adjusted in women receiving prophylactic treatment to prevent PTB, and whether this improves the outcome. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3