Revisiting MOMS criteria for prenatal repair of spina bifida: upper gestational‐age limit should be raised and assessment of prenatal motor function rather than anatomical level improves prediction of postnatal function

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo determine if the lower‐extremity neurological motor function level in fetuses with open spina bifida deteriorates within the 4‐week interval between a first prenatal motor assessment at around 22 weeks of gestation and a second evaluation, prior to ‘late’ prenatal surgery, defined as surgery at 26–28 weeks and, in certain situations, up to 30 weeks, and to assess the association between prenatal presurgical motor‐function level, anatomical level of the lesion and postnatal motor‐function level.MethodsThis was a two‐center cohort study of 94 singleton fetuses with open spina bifida which underwent percutaneous repair using the skin‐over‐biocellulose for antenatal fetoscopic repair (SAFER) technique between December 2016 and January 2022. All women underwent two prenatal systematic ultrasound evaluations, approximately 4 weeks apart, with the second one being performed less than 1 week before surgery, and one postnatal evaluation via physical examination within 2 months of birth. Motor‐function classification was from spinal level T12 to S1, according to key muscle function. Each leg was analyzed separately; in case of discrepancy between the two legs, the worst motor‐function level was considered for analysis. Motor‐function‐level evaluations were compared with each other and with the anatomical level as observed on ultrasound. Independent predictors of a postnatal reduction in motor‐function level were assessed using a logistic regression model.ResultsPrenatal motor‐function level was assessed at a median gestational age of 22.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 20.7–24.3) and 26.7 (IQR, 25.4–27.3) weeks, with a median interval of 4.0 (IQR, 2.4–6.0) weeks. The median gestational age at surgery was 27.0 (IQR, 25.9–27.6) weeks and the postnatal examination was at median age of 0.8 (IQR, 0.3–5.4) months. There was no significant difference in motor‐function level between the two prenatal evaluations (P = 0.861). We therefore decided to use the second prenatal evaluation for comparison with postnatal motor function and anatomical level. Overall, prenatal and postnatal motor function evaluations were significantly different from the anatomical level (preoperative assessment, P = 0.0015; postnatal assessment, P = 0.0333). Comparing prenatal with postnatal motor‐function level, we found that 87.2% of babies had similar or improved motor function compared with that prior to prenatal surgery. On logistic regression analysis, lower anatomical level of defect and greater difference between anatomical level and prenatal motor‐function level were identified as independent predictors of postnatal motor function (odds ratio, 0.237 (95% CI, 0.095–0.588) (P = 0.002) and 3.44 (95% CI, 1.738–6.813) (P < 0.001), respectively).ConclusionsDuring a 4‐week interval between first ultrasound evaluation and late fetal surgical repair of open spina bifida, motor function does not change significantly, suggesting that late repair, ≥ 26 weeks, does not impact negatively on motor‐function outcome. Compared with the anatomical level of the lesion, preoperative neurological motor‐function assessment via ultrasound is more predictive of postnatal motor function, and should be included in preoperative counseling. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.