Competence to proceed in SVP commitment hearings: Irrelevant or fundamental due process right?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Competence to proceed in SVP commitment hearings: Irrelevant or fundamental due process right?

Published:2010-09 Issue:5 Volume:28 Page:647-670
ISSN:0735-3936
Container-title:Behavioral Sciences & the Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav. Sci. Law

Author:

Fanniff Amanda M.,Otto Randy K.,Petrila John

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/bsl.957/fullpdf

Reference96 articles.

1. Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 1979

2. ‘Real world’ comparison of first- and second-generation antipsychotics in regard to length of inpatient hospitalization and number of re-hospitalizations;Advokat;Psychiatric Quarterly,2008

3. American Bar Association Criminal Justice Standards (ABACJS) Committee 1989 ABA Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/standards/mentalhealth.pdf

4. Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS)

5. Baxstrom v. Herold 1966

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘He seems odd’: the effects of risk-irrelevant information and actuarial risk estimates on mock jurors’ perceptions of sexual recidivism risk;Psychology, Crime & Law;2021-04-02

2. Risk and Outcomes: Are Adolescents Charged with Sex Offenses Different from Other Adolescent Offenders?;Journal of Youth and Adolescence;2016-07-12

3. Disputed paraphilia diagnoses and legal decision making: A case law survey of paraphilia NOS, nonconsent.;Psychology, Public Policy, and Law;2014

4. Accuracy of Sexually Violent Person Assessments of Juveniles Adjudicated for Sexual Offenses;Sexual Abuse;2013-03-18