A comparison of bias‐adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small‐sample longitudinal studies

Author:

Gosho Masahiko1ORCID,Ishii Ryota1,Noma Hisashi2ORCID,Maruo Kazushi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai Tsukuba Japan

2. Department of Data Science The Institute of Statistical Mathematics Tachikawa Japan

Abstract

Using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) can lead to a bias in regression coefficients for a small sample or sparse data. The bias‐corrected GEE (BCGEE) and penalized GEE (PGEE) were proposed to resolve the small‐sample bias. Moreover, the standard sandwich covariance estimator leads to a bias of standard error for small samples; several modified covariance estimators have been proposed to address this issue. We review the modified GEEs and modified covariance estimators, and evaluate their performance in sparse binary data from small‐sample longitudinal studies. The simulation results showed that GEE and BCGEE often failed to achieve convergence, whereas the convergence proportion for PGEE was quite high. The bias for the regression coefficients was generally in the ascending order of PGEE BCGEE GEE. However, PGEE and BCGEE did not sufficiently remove the bias involving 20–30 subjects with unequal exposure levels with a 5% response rate. The coverage probability (CP) of the confidence interval for BCGEE was relatively poor compared with GEE and PGEE. The CP with the sandwich covariance estimator deteriorated regardless of the GEE methods under the small sample size and low response rate, whereas the CP with the modified covariance estimators—such as Morel's method—was relatively acceptable. PGEE will be the reasonable way for analyzing sparse binary data in small‐sample studies. Instead of using the standard sandwich covariance estimator, one should always apply the modified covariance estimators for analyzing these data.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics and Probability,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3