Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights

Published:2023-05-20 Issue:5 Volume:169 Page:1393-1396
ISSN:0194-5998
Container-title:Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Otolaryngol.--head neck surg.

Author:

Yalamanchi Pratyusha¹^ORCID,Faucett Erynne A.²,Shuman Andrew G.¹³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery UC Davis Children's Hospital Sacramento USA

3. Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractOur nation faces contentious questions regarding reproductive rights and access to abortion which have long been viewed as beyond the scope of otolaryngology. The broad implications of the recent Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Jackson) impact all people who are, or can become, pregnant and their health care providers. The consequences for otolaryngologists are thus far‐reaching and poorly understood. Here we describe how the post‐Dobbs landscape is relevant to the practice of otolaryngology and offer suggestions for how otolaryngologists can best respond, prepare, and support their patients in this tenuous political landscape.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Reference19 articles.

1. Supreme Court Decision: Dobbs v Jackson. Supreme Court of the United States. Accessed October 18 2022.https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

2. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Roe

3. JermanJ JonesRK OndaT. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008 Guttmacher Institute. 2016.https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014.pdf

4. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions

5. Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion