Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes

Author:

Rose Eric J.12ORCID,Moodie Erica E. M.1ORCID,Shortreed Susan M.34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics McGill University Montreal QC Canada

2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University at Albany Rensselaer New York USA

3. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA

4. Department of Biostatistics University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractData‐driven methods for personalizing treatment assignment have garnered much attention from clinicians and researchers. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize this through a sequence of decision rules that map individual patient characteristics to a recommended treatment. Observational studies are commonly used for estimating dynamic treatment regimes due to the potentially prohibitive costs of conducting sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. However, estimating a dynamic treatment regime from observational data can lead to bias in the estimated regime due to unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analyses are useful for assessing how robust the conclusions of the study are to a potential unmeasured confounder. A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis is a probabilistic approach that involves positing and sampling from distributions for the parameters governing the bias. We propose a method for performing a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of the bias due to unmeasured confounding in the estimation of dynamic treatment regimes. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed procedure with a simulation study and apply it to an observational study examining tailoring the use of antidepressant medication for reducing symptoms of depression using data from Kaiser Permanente Washington.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Medicine,Statistics and Probability

Reference52 articles.

1. Resampling fewer than n observations: Gains, losses, and remedies for losses;Bickel P. J.;Statistica Sinica,1997

2. Blackwell D. L. &Villarroel M. A.(2018).Tables of summary health statistics for U.S. adults: 2017 National Health Interview Survey.http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/SHS/tables.htm

3. When to Start Treatment? A Systematic Approach to the Comparison of Dynamic Regimes Using Observational Data

4. Inference for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using an Adaptive m ‐Out‐of‐ n Bootstrap Scheme

5. Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. NO UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: KNOWN UNKNOWNS OR… NOT?;American Journal of Epidemiology;2023-06-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3