Multivariate joint model under competing risks to predict death of hospitalized patients for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Author:

Lavalley‐Morelle Alexandra1ORCID,Peiffer‐Smadja Nathan12,Gressens Simon B.2ORCID,Souhail Bérénice2,Lahens Alexandre2,Bounhiol Agathe2,Lescure François‐Xavier12,Mentré France13,Mullaert Jimmy13

Affiliation:

1. Université Paris Cité INSERM, IAME Paris France

2. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, AP‐HP Bichat‐Claude Bernard University Hospital Paris France

3. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, AP‐HP Bichat‐Claude Bernard University Hospital Paris France

Abstract

AbstractDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, several clinical prognostic scores have been proposed and evaluated in hospitalized patients, relying on variables available at admission. However, capturing data collected from the longitudinal follow‐up of patients during hospitalization may improve prediction accuracy of a clinical outcome. To answer this question, 327 patients diagnosed with COVID‐19 and hospitalized in an academic French hospital between January and July 2020 are included in the analysis. Up to 59 biomarkers were measured from the patient admission to the time to death or discharge from hospital. We consider a joint model with multiple linear or nonlinear mixed‐effects models for biomarkers evolution, and a competing risks model involving subdistribution hazard functions for the risks of death and discharge. The links are modeled by shared random effects, and the selection of the biomarkers is mainly based on the significance of the link between the longitudinal and survival parts. Three biomarkers are retained: the blood neutrophil counts, the arterial pH, and the C‐reactive protein. The predictive performances of the model are evaluated with the time‐dependent area under the curve (AUC) for different landmark and horizon times, and compared with those obtained from a baseline model that considers only information available at admission. The joint modeling approach helps to improve predictions when sufficient information is available. For landmark 6 days and horizon of 30 days, we obtain AUC [95% CI] 0.73 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.81 [0.73, 0.89] for the baseline and joint model, respectively (p = 0.04). Statistical inference is validated through a simulation study.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Medicine,Statistics and Probability

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3