The role of genotypic and climatic variation at the range edge: A case study in winegrapes

Abstract

AbstractPremiseChanges in habitat suitability due to climate change are causing range shifts, with new habitat potentially available at cold range edges. We must predict these range shifts, but forecasters have limited knowledge of how genetic differences in plant physiological tolerances influence range shifts. Here, we focus on a major determinant of species ranges—physiological tolerance to extreme cold—to ask how warming over recent decades and genetic variation shape expansion across complex landscapes.MethodsWe examined how genotypes vary in maximum cold tolerance from 9 years of cold hardiness data across 18 genotypes from 13 sites, using winegrapes (Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera) as a case study. Combining a Bayesian hierarchical dose‐response model with gridded climate data, we then project changes in climatic suitability near winegrapes’ current cold range‐edge between 1949 and 2016.ResultsPlants increased maximum cold hardiness non‐linearly with decreasing air temperature (maximum cold hardiness: –23.6°C), but with substantial (by 2°C) variation across genotypes. Our results suggest, since the 1980s, decreasing freeze injury risk has made conditions more favorable for all genotypes at the cold range‐edge, but conditions remained more favorable for more cold hardy genotypes and in warmer areas. There was substantial spatial variation in habitat suitability, with the majority of suitably warm habitat located in a narrow north‐south oriented strip.ConclusionsWe highlight the importance of genotypic differences in physiological tolerances when assessing range shift potential with climate change. Habitat improvements were unevenly distributed over the spatially complex landscape, though, emphasizing the importance of dispersal in range expansion.