A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDespite medical advancement, pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) still has high morbidity and mortality, due to challenging detection in clinical practice. Ultrasound has been touted as the next best diagnostic tool but currently, this claim is unfounded. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review the diagnostic parameters of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pediatric PTB.MethodsThe literature search started and ended on December 23, 2023. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Our research question could be formulated as “In pediatric patients who present with signs and symptoms of PTB such as fever, cough, and poor weight gain, how accurate is chest ultrasound in ruling in and ruling out pediatric PTB when the diagnosis is compared to culture, PCR or CXR?” This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA‐DTA guidelines while the meta‐analysis was conducted with STATA program using the “midas” and “metandi” commands.ResultsThere are five studies included with 137 positive PTB children. The combined sensitivity is 84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76–89), specificity of 38% (95% CI: 24–54), and summary receiver operating curve yields an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86). The I2 value is 24% (95% CI: 0–100) with a p‐value of 0.13. The combined negative predictive value is 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58–0.79), and the positive predictive value is 0.57 (95% CI: 0.51–0.63). The positive likelihood ratio is 1 with a 6% increase from the baseline while the negative likelihood ratio is 0.43 with a 12% decrease from the baseline.ConclusionChest ultrasound is sensitive but currently could neither exclude nor confirm pediatric PTB.