Pain in Multiple System Atrophy a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Campese Nicole1ORCID,Caliò Bianca12,Leys Fabian1ORCID,Kaltenbach Lalit3,Göbel Georg3,Wanschitz Julia1,Schlager Andreas4,Zamarian Laura1,Bannister Kirsty5,Chaudhuri Ray K.56ORCID,Schrag Anette7ORCID,Granata Roberta1,Kiechl Stefan1,Poewe Werner1,Seppi Klaus1ORCID,Wenning Gregor1,Fanciulli Alessandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

2. Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

3. Institute for Medical Statistics and Informatics Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

4. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

5. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom

6. Parkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence Kings College Hospital London United Kingdom

7. Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences University College London London United Kingdom

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIndividuals with multiple system atrophy (MSA) often complain about pain, nonetheless this remains a poorly investigated non‐motor feature of MSA.ObjectivesHere, we aimed at assessing the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors for pain in individuals with MSA.MethodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically screened the PubMED, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for papers published in English until September 30, 2022, combining the following keywords: “pain,” “multiple system atrophy,” “MSA,” “olivopontocerebellar atrophy,” “OPCA,” “striatonigral degeneration,” “SND,” “Shy Drager,” and “atypical parkinsonism.”ResultsThe search identified 700 records. Sixteen studies provided information on pain prevalence in cohorts of MSA individuals and were included in a qualitative assessment based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Thirteen studies (11 cross‐sectional, two longitudinal) scored ≥14 points on QUADAS assessment and were included in a quantitative analysis, pooling data from 1236 MSA individuals. The resulting pooled prevalence of pain in MSA was 67% (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 57%–75%), and significantly higher in individuals with MSA of parkinsonian rather than cerebellar type (76% [95% CI = 63%–87%] vs. 45% [95% CI = 33%–57%], P = 0.001). Pain assessment tools and collected information were highly heterogeneous across studies. Two studies reported pain treatment strategies and found that only every second person with MSA complaining about pain had received targeted treatment.ConclusionsWe found that pain is a frequent, but still under‐recognized and undertreated feature of MSA. Further research is needed to improve pain detection and treatment in MSA.

Funder

Multiple System Atrophy Coalition

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3