Current status of US soil test phosphorus and potassium recommendations and analytical methods

Author:

Lyons Sarah E.1ORCID,Clark Jason D.2ORCID,Osmond Deanna L.1ORCID,Parvej Md Rasel3,Pearce Austin W.4ORCID,Slaton Nathan A.5ORCID,Spargo John T.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

2. Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science South Dakota State University Brookings South Dakota USA

3. Macon Ridge Research Station Louisiana State University Winnsboro Louisiana USA

4. Field to Market Washington District of Columbia USA

5. Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture Fayetteville Arkansas USA

6. Agricultural Analytical Services Lab Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractSoil testing is the foundation of fertilizer recommendations in the United States. Fertilizer recommendations have primarily been developed by land‐grant universities with limited coordination among programs. The individual state approach to develop fertilizer recommendations has resulted in discrepancies in recommended soil sampling protocols, soil analysis methods, and fertilizer recommendations at similar soil nutrient levels. A national survey was developed to summarize the status of soil testing and fertility work in the United States to inform future collaborative efforts among states and regions and identify opportunities to harmonize recommendation guidelines. Topics included relevant funding, multi‐state collaborations, state soil‐test recommendations and related data, fertilization philosophies, and analytical and soil sampling methods. Responses from 48 states and Puerto Rico showed inconsistencies across state boundaries in every category. The number of faculty full‐time equivalents working in soil fertility now averages 1.3 per state, a 21.5% decrease every 10 years since the 1950s. Land‐grant university soil‐test‐based phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) recommendation philosophies were categorized as Sufficiency (37%), Build and Maintain (19%), hybrid (20%), or multiple philosophies for which recommendations are provided (20%). Respondents in two states did not know the recommendation philosophy (4%). Fertilizer‐P and K recommendations for corn (Zea mays L.) were based on eight different extractants with differences across and within regions. While there have been some successful regional efforts in the past, additional multi‐state collaborative efforts are needed to identify research gaps and develop comprehensive strategies to update soil‐test correlation and calibration data to address modern agronomic, economic, and environmental concerns.

Funder

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Agricultural Research Service

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science

Reference21 articles.

1. Nutrient and pH stratification with conventional and no‐till management

2. Culman S. Fulford A. Camberato J. &Steinke K.(2020).Tri‐state fertilizer recommendations for corn soybeans wheat and alfalfa(Bulletin 974). College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences The Ohio State University.

3. Soil Test Correlation, Calibration, and Recommendation

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3