Combining corn N recommendation tools for an improved economical optimal nitrogen rate estimation

Author:

Ransom Curtis J.1ORCID,Kitchen Newell R.1,Camberato James J.2,Carter Paul R.3,Ferguson Richard B.4,Fernández Fabián G.5ORCID,Franzen David W.6ORCID,Laboski Carrie A. M.7ORCID,Myers David Brenton3,Nafziger Emerson D.8,Sawyer John E.9ORCID,Shanahan John F.10

Affiliation:

1. USDA‐ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia Missouri USA

2. Department of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

3. Retired Corteva Agriscience Johnston Iowa USA

4. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska Lincoln Nebraska USA

5. Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USA

6. Department of Soil Science North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA

7. USDA‐ARS Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Unit University Park Pennsylvania USA

8. Crop Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA

9. Retired Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA

10. Agoro Carbon Alliance Lincoln Nebraska USA

Abstract

AbstractImproving corn (Zea mays L.) nitrogen (N) rate fertilizer recommendation tools can improve farmers’ profits and mitigate N pollution. Numerous approaches have been tested to improve these tools, but to date improvements for predicting economically optimum N rate (EONR) have been modest. This work's objective was to use ensemble learning to improve our estimation of EONR (for a single at‐planting and split N application timing) by combining multiple corn N recommendation tools. The evaluation was conducted using 49 corn N response trials from eight states in the US Corn Belt and three growing seasons (2014–2016). Elastic net and decision tree approaches regressed EONR against three unique tools for each N application timing. Tools used in various combinations included a yield goal method, two soil nitrate tests (pre‐plant and late season), a computer simulation crop model (Maize‐N), and canopy reflectance sensing. Any combination of two or three N recommendation tools improved or maintained performance metrics (R2, root‐mean square error , and number of sites close to EONR). The best results for a single at‐planting recommendation occurred when combining the three at‐planting N recommendation tools (including interactions) with an elastic net regression model. This combined recommendation tool had a significant linear relationship with EONR (R2 = 0.46), an increase of 0.27 over the best tool evaluated alone. Combining multiple tools increased the implementation cost, but it did not reduce profitability and, sometimes, improved profitability. These results show tools can be combined to better match EONR, and thus could aid farmers in improving N management.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3