Mapping the landscape of water and society research: Promising combinations of compatible and complementary disciplines

Author:

Muller Marc F.12ORCID,Rusca Maria3ORCID,Bertassello Leonardo2ORCID,Adams Ellis4ORCID,Allaire Maura5ORCID,Cabello Villarejo Violeta6ORCID,Levy Morgan78ORCID,Mukherjee Jenia9ORCID,Pokhrel Yadu10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Systems Analysis Integrated Assessment and Modelling Eawag Dübendorf Switzerland

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA

3. Global Development Institute University of Manchester Manchester UK

4. Keough School of Global Affairs University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Indiana USA

5. Department of Urban Planning & Public Policy University of California Irvine California USA

6. Basque Centre for Climate Change Bilbao Spain

7. Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

8. School of Global Policy and Strategy University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

9. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kharagpur West Bengal India

10. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractCoupled human‐water systems (CHWS) are diverse and have been studied across a wide variety of disciplines. Integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives on CHWS provides a comprehensive and actionable understanding of these complex systems. While interdisciplinary integration has often remained elusive, specific combinations of disciplines might be comparably easier to integrate (compatible), and/or their combination might be particularly likely to uncover previously unobtainable insights (complementary). This paper systematically identifies such promising combinations by mapping disciplines along a common set of topical, philosophical, and methodological dimensions. It also identifies key challenges and lessons for multidisciplinary research teams seeking to integrate highly promising (complementary) but poorly compatible disciplines. Applied to eight disciplines that span the environmental physical sciences and the quantitative and qualitative social sciences, we found that promising combinations of disciplines identified by the typology broadly reproduce patterns of recent interdisciplinary collaborative research revealed by a bibliometric analysis. We also found that some disciplines are centrally located within the typology by being compatible and complementary to multiple other disciplines along distinct dimensions. This points to the potential for these disciplines to act as catalysts for wider interdisciplinary integration.This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Methods Human Water > Methods Science of Water > Methods

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Ecology,Oceanography

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3