Affiliation:
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer Center of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Ulm Germany
2. Department of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry University Medical Center Ulm Ulm Germany
3. Agaplesion Bethesda Ulm, Geriatric Research Ulm University and Geriatric Center Ulm Germany
4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Lübeck Germany
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDemographic development in rural and urban areas differs substantially. Demographics and access to specialized head and neck cancer centers may affect head and neck cancer patients' (HNCP) outcomes. Here, we compare epidemiological indicators and outcomes of HNCP in rural and urban Germany.Patients and MethodsIn a retrospective analysis of data from the Center for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) between 2002 and 2017, 212,920 HNCP were included. Incidence, demographics, travel distance to specialized centers, and ground values were compared between rural and urban areas with a focus on their association with patient outcomes.ResultsThe mean age of HNCP was significantly higher in urban areas (mean difference = 1.4 years; p < 0.0001), but increased at a comparable rate (p = 0.26) in rural and urban areas during the observation period. Gender imbalance was higher in rural areas (mean ratio of men/women: 4.1 vs. 3.1; p < 0.0001), but showed a comparable trend toward equilibration in both, rural and urban districts (p = 0.46). The portion of HNCP of the entire HNCP population living in urban areas increased from 55.9% in the year 2002 to 76.4% in the year 2017. There was no significant difference or change in the ratio of advanced to low UICC stage during the observation period (p = 0.26). However, travel distances to medical centers were higher in rural areas, especially (p < 0.0001) in East Germany. Median survival of HNCP in rural areas was significantly lower than in urban areas (42 months [SEM = 0.7; CI: 40.5–43.5] vs. 54 months [SEM = 1.2; CI: 51.7–56.3]; p < 0.0001) in East Germany, whereas in West Germany no significant difference was observed (59 months [SEM = 0.8; CI: 57.4–60.6] vs. 60 months [SEM = 0.5; CI: 59.0–61.0]; p = 0.15).ConclusionsPlace of residence contributes to survival outcome of HNCP. Access to specialized care and socioeconomic factors could be improved in East Germany.
Subject
Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology
Reference29 articles.
1. 30 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall: regional health differences in Germany;Lampert T;J Health Monit,2019
2. Überlebensvorteile bei Behandlung in zertifizierten Krebszentren;Schoffer O;Gesundheit Und Gesellschaft Wissenschaft,2022
3. Bau‐ S‐uR Bundesinstitut.Stadt‐Und Raumforschung 2010: Laufende Raumbeobachtung–Raumabgrenzungen.2022.https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/gemeinden/Raumtypen2010_vbg/Raumtypen2010_alt.html
4. Head and neck cancer in a developing country: A population-based perspective across 8years
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献