Recalibrating Bioethics for the Reality of Interdependence: The Challenge of Collective‐Impact Problems

Author:

Solomon Mildred Z.

Abstract

AbstractBioethics in the twenty‐first century is confronting what one might call “collective‐impact problems.” The ethics guidance and policies that are developed to address these kinds of problems will affect not only individuals but everyone living and future generations too. With many collective‐impact problems, all parties will eventually be worse off if there is a failure to develop solutions to head off damage to the shared environment. However, the effects are not felt equally throughout and across societies; some groups are hit far worse. To address collective‐impact problems, bioethics needs to recalibrate. Our field, and especially American bioethics, should find a better balance between individual rights and the best interests of the group, develop more robust tools for examining structural inequities that damage people's health and well‐being, and study how to engage the public in learning about and shaping ethics guidance for these complex problems.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science),Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference12 articles.

1. Seeking the unseen

2. The term “collective impact” was introduced in a 2011 article by John Kania and Mark Kramer in theStanford Social Innovation Reviewto call for a paradigm shift in how funders and social‐change activists ought to think about and organize for social change. The approach insists on identifying all stakeholders and aligning their efforts to achieve a common goal and calls on funders to support cross‐sector collaboration rather than one‐off interventions. I am using the term very differently to describe problems in need of ethical analysis and policy guidance whose resolution (or lack thereof) will impact everyone including future generations as well as those living in distant geographic locations. J. Kania and M. Kramer “Collective Impact ”Stanford Social Innovation Review(Winter 2011) https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact.

3. “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter ” Future of Life Institute March 22 2023 https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause‐giant‐ai‐experiments/.

4. Bioethics and Populism:How Should Our Field Respond?

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3