Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
Abstract
SummaryGoogle, Facebook, OpenAI, and others have released access to versions of language chatbots that they have developed. These chatbots have been trained on massive amounts of text using neural networks for language processing. Using an approach similar to security penetration testing, this paper investigates and compares three different chatbots, assessing potential strengths and limitations of these systems. The paper presents several findings, including a comparison of those systems across answers to common questions, an analysis of the use of names and activities to guide discussion in two systems, an analysis of the extent of differences in responses arising from “regeneration” of a question, the determination of a weakness in a system of knowing “who” invented something, development of a potential new subfield, sensitive topic classifiers, and an analysis of some of the implications of these findings. As part of this analysis, I find emerging topics in chatbots, such as “topic stalemate” and the use of sensitive topic classifiers.
Subject
Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference19 articles.
1. Denning S.(2022).Why big firms find it hard to innovate https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2020/01/12/why-big-firms-find-it-hard-to-innovate/?sh=4fbd40622ec4
2. BERT: Pre‐training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding;Devlin J.;Computing Research Repository,2018
3. Elsen‐Rooney M.(2022).NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices networks https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-writing-artificial-intelligence
4. Forrester. (2019).Prioritize personalization when choosing conversational chatbot platforms to reap rewards Technical Report.
5. An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献