Gastric cancer detection based on cell‐free DNA in blood: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Wang Mona123ORCID,Fan Xiaohan2345,Huang Boyang123,Pan Kaifeng236,Gerhard Markus123,Mejías‐Luque Raquel123,Zhang Yang234

Affiliation:

1. TUM School of Medicine and Health, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

2. PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

3. PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute Beijing China

4. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute Beijing China

5. Scientific Research Department Peking University First Hospital Beijing China

6. State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveScreening and early diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) are crucial for improved prognosis. However, gastroscopic screening is not feasible in large populations due to its high cost and invasive nature. The detection of circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) provides an attractive minimally‐invasive alternative for screening of GC. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we evaluate the diagnostic value of cfDNA‐based markers for GC, including the detection of total concentration, mutations, and methylation alterations.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of four literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) for articles published before November 2022. The revised tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS‐2) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021210830.ResultsA total of 15 original articles involving 2849 individuals were included in this meta‐analysis, comprising five studies on concentration, nine studies on methylation alterations, and one study on mutation biomarkers of cfDNA. Among these studies, seven selected early‐stage GC subjects. For the diagnoses of overall stages and early‐stage GC, the pooled sensitivities with 95% confidence interval were 0.74 (0.66–0.82) and 0.64 (0.51–0.76), and the pooled specificities were 0.92 (0.84–0.96) and 0.94 (0.87–0.98) with summary areas under the curve (SAUCs) of 0.89 (0.86–0.91) and 0.86 (0.83–0.89), respectively.ConclusionsThis meta‐analysis suggests that cfDNA‐based biomarkers show diagnostic value for GC early detection.

Funder

Joint Fund to Promote Cross-Straits Scientific and Technological Cooperation

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3