Comparison between self‐reported and actigraphy‐derived sleep measures in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: Secondary analysis of observational data

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) frequently report disrupted sleep. However, there are often inconsistencies between objectively measured and questionnaire‐derived sleep measures. We compared sleep measures estimated from wrist actigraphy and self‐report in adults receiving HPN.MethodsIn this secondary analysis, we pooled data from two sleep‐related studies enrolling adults receiving habitual HPN. We compared measures from 7‐day averages of wrist actigraphy against comparable responses to a sleep questionnaire. Sleep measures included bedtime, wake time, time in bed, total sleep time, and sleep onset latency (SOL). Spearman correlation coefficients, Bland‐Altman plots, and linear regression models for each set of sleep measures provided estimates of agreement.ResultsParticipants (N = 35) had a mean age of 52 years, body mass index of 21.6 kg/m2, and 77% identified as female. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.35 to 0.90, were highest for wake time (r = 0.90) and bedtime (r = 0.74), and lowest for total sleep time (r = 0.35). Actigraphy overestimated self‐reported bedtime, wake time, and total sleep time and underestimated self‐reported time in bed and SOL. Regression coefficients indicated the highest calibration for bedtime and wake time and lower calibration for time in bed, total sleep time, and SOL.ConclusionWe observed strong‐to‐moderate agreement between sleep measures derived from wrist actigraphy and self‐report in adults receiving HPN. Weaker correlations for total sleep time and SOL may indicate low wrist actigraphy sensitivity. Low‐quality sleep resulting from sleep disruptions may have also contributed to an underreporting of perceived sleep quantity and lower concordance.