Scientists' perspectives on ethical issues in research with emerging portable neuroimaging technology: The need for guidance on ethical, legal, and societal implications (ELSI)

Abstract

AbstractDeployment of new, more portable, and less costly neuroimaging technologies such as portable magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography, positron emission tomography, functional near‐infrared spectroscopy, high‐density diffuse optical tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging is advancing rapidly. Given this trajectory toward increasing use of neuroimaging outside the hospital, we sought to identify ethical, legal, and societal implications (ELSI) of these new technologies by understanding the perspectives of those scientists and engineers developing and implementing portable neuroimaging technologies in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Based on a literature review, we identified and contacted 19 potential interviewees and then conducted 11 semi‐structured interviews in English by Zoom. Analysis of the interviews revealed key themes and ELSI issues. Developers reported that without proper ELSI guidance, portable and accessible neuroimaging technology could be misused, fail to comply with applicable regulation and policy, and ultimately fall short in its mission to provide neuroimaging for the world. Our interviews suggested that ELSI guidance should address differences between imaging modalities because they vary in capability, limitations, and likelihood of generating incidental findings.