Lack of spontaneous typical seizures during intracranial monitoring with stereo‐electroencephalography

Author:

Bottan Juan S.12ORCID,Alshahrani Ashwaq2,Gilmore Greydon2,Steven David A.23,Burneo Jorge G.234ORCID,Lau Jonathan C.2ORCID,McLachlan Richard S.2,Parrent Andrew G.2,MacDougall Keith W.2,Diosy David C.2,Mirsattari Seyed M.2,Suller Marti Ana25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Neurosurgery Hospital General de Niños “Pedro De Elizalde” Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina

2. Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

3. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

4. Neuroepidemiology Unit, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

5. Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIn the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE), occasionally, patients do not experience spontaneous typical seizures (STS) during a stereo‐electroencephalography (SEEG) study, which limits its effectiveness. We sought to identify risk factors for patients who did not have STS during SEEG and to analyze the clinical outcomes for this particular set of patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with DRE who underwent depth electrode implantation and SEEG recordings between January 2013 and December 2018.ResultsSEEG was performed in 155 cases during this period. 11 (7.2%) did not experience any clinical seizures (non‐STS group), while 143 experienced at least one patient‐typical seizure during admission (STS group). No significant differences were found between STS and non‐STS groups in terms of patient demographics, lesional/non‐lesional epilepsy ratio, pre‐SEEG seizure frequency, number of ASMs used, electrographic seizures or postoperative seizure outcome in those who underwent resective surgery. Statistically significant differences were found in the average number of electrodes implanted (7.0 in the non‐STS group vs. 10.2 in STS), days in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (21.8 vs. 12.8 days) and the number of cases that underwent resective surgery following SEEG (27.3% vs. 60.8%), respectively. The three non‐STS patients (30%) who underwent surgery, all had their typical seizures triggered during ECS studies. Three cases were found to have psychogenic non‐epileptic seizures. None of the patients in the non‐STS group were offered neurostimulation devices. Five of the non‐STS patients experienced transient seizure improvement following SEEG.SignificanceWe were unable to identify any factors that predicted lack of seizures during SEEG recordings. Resective surgery was only offered in cases where ECS studies replicated patient‐typical seizures. Larger datasets are required to be able to identify factors that predict which patients will fail to develop seizures during SEEG.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3