Access to legacy‐oriented interventions at end of life for pediatric oncology patients: A decedent cohort review

Author:

Daniels Sarah1ORCID,Franqui‐Rios Nelson D.2,Mothi Suraj S.3,Gaitskill Elizabeth1,Cantrell Kathryn4,Kaye Erica C.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Child Life Program St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

2. School of Medicine Ponce Health Sciences University Ponce Puerto Rico Puerto Rico

3. Department of Biostatistics St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

4. Department of Human Development, Family Studies, and Counseling Texas Woman's University Denton Texas USA

5. Department of Oncology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLegacy‐oriented interventions have the potential to offer pediatric oncology patients and families comfort at end of life and during bereavement. Certified child life specialists often provide these services, and presently little is known about whether disparities exist in the provision of legacy‐oriented interventions.MethodsIn this retrospective decedent cohort study, we examined demographic and clinical characteristics from a sample of 678 pediatric oncology patients who died between 2015 and 2019. Bivariate analysis assessed differences between patients who received any versus no legacy‐oriented intervention. Uni‐ and multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations of baseline characteristics and likelihood of receiving legacy‐oriented intervention. Further multivariable analysis explored joint effects of significant variables identified in the univariable analysis.ResultsFifty‐two percent of patients received a legacy‐oriented intervention. Older adolescents (≥13 years) were less likely (odds ratio [OR]: 1.73, p = .007) to receive legacy‐oriented interventions than younger ones. Patients with home/hospice deaths were also less likely (OR: 19.98, p < .001) to receive interventions compared to patients who passed away at SJCRH locations. Hispanic patients (OR: 1.53, p = .038) and those in palliative care (OR: 10.51, p < .001) were more likely to receive interventions. No significant race association was noted.ConclusionAll children and adolescents with cancer deserve quality care at end of life, including access to legacy‐oriented interventions, yet nearly half of patients in this cohort did not receive these services. By identifying demographic and clinical characteristics associated with decreased odds of receiving legacy‐oriented interventions, healthcare professionals can modify end‐of‐life care processes to improve access. Introducing legacy‐oriented interventions early and increasing exposure in community spaces may enhance access to legacy‐oriented interventions for pediatric oncology patients.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3