Attitudes of autistic adults toward genetic testing for autism

Author:

Gallion Tielle1ORCID,Williams Zachary J.23456ORCID,Niarchou Maria7ORCID,Duncan Laura18,Hooker Gillian1,Taylor Kelly A.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Master of Genetic Counseling Program Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA

2. Medical Scientist Training Program Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

4. Vanderbilt Brain Institute Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

5. Frist Center for Autism and Innovation Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

6. Vanderbilt Kennedy Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

7. Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

8. Department of Pediatrics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractGenetic testing for autism has been a controversial topic within the autistic community. Opinions regarding the benefits, risks, and limitations of genetic testing often differ between autistic people, researchers, and healthcare providers. The present study sought to understand the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing of autistic adults and compare perspectives of autistic people who have had genetic testing with those who have not. An international sample of 173 autistic adults (19 [11%] who had previously undergone autism‐related genetic testing) completed an online survey with questions assessing beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing. Beliefs and attitudes about genetic testing varied widely across the sample. Autistic individuals who had received prior genetic testing had much more positive beliefs about autism‐related genetic testing (d = 0.87, 95% CI [0.37, 1.36]) and attitudes toward genetic testing (d = 1.14, 95% CI [0.66, 1.61]) compared to those who had not received such testing, although there were no meaningful differences between those same groups regarding beliefs about genetic testing unrelated to autism (d = 0.02, 95% CI [−0.45, 0.49], p = 0.93). Intention to genetically test oneself or one's (hypothetical) children was also significantly predicted by autism‐specific beliefs, attitudes, and prior genetic testing status. A large majority of the sample (78.6%) also agreed that autistic individuals would benefit from contact with a genetic counselor in certain situations. These findings suggest that the autistic community does not have a singular view of genetic testing, and for those Autistic individuals who are interested in pursuing genetic testing for themselves or a family member, genetic counselors have the potential to play a key role in clinical care.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference67 articles.

1. Ajzen I.(2019).TPB questionnaire construction. Retrieved April 15 2022 fromhttps://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf

2. Autism Self Advocacy Network. (2022).ASAN Statement on Genetic Research and Autism. Retrieved April 4 2022 fromhttps://autisticadvocacy.org/wp‐content/uploads/2022/03/genetic‐statement.pdf

3. Association of Genetic and Environmental Factors With Autism in a 5-Country Cohort

4. Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3