Long‐term efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in initially acutely ill adults with schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Author:

Leucht Stefan1,Schneider‐Thoma Johannes1,Burschinski Angelika1,Peter Natalie1,Wang Dongfang1,Dong Shimeng1,Huhn Maximilian12,Nikolakopoulou Adriani3,Salanti Georgia4,Davis John M.56

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich Klinikum rechts der Isar Munich Germany

2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum Bamberg Bamberg Germany

3. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

4. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern Bern Switzerland

5. Psychiatric Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago IL USA

6. Maryland Psychiatric Research Center Baltimore MD USA

Abstract

Most acute phase antipsychotic drug trials in schizophrenia last only a few weeks, but patients must usually take these drugs much longer. We examined the long‐term efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in acutely ill patients using network meta‐analysis. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register up to March 6, 2022 for randomized, blinded trials of at least 6‐month duration on all second‐generation and 18 first‐generation antipsychotics. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms of schizophrenia; secondary outcomes were all‐cause discontinuation; change in positive, negative and depressive symptoms; quality of life, social functioning, weight gain, antiparkinson medication use, akathisia, serum prolactin level, QTc prolongation, and sedation. Confidence in the results was assessed by the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta‐Analysis) framework. We included 45 studies with 11,238 participants. In terms of overall symptoms, olanzapine was on average more efficacious than ziprasidone (standardized mean difference, SMD=0.37, 95% CI: 0.26‐0.49), asenapine (SMD=0.33, 95% CI: 0.21‐0.45), iloperidone (SMD=0.32, 95% CI: 0.15‐0.49), paliperidone (SMD=0.28, 95% CI: 0.11‐0.44), haloperidol (SMD=0.27, 95% CI: 0.14‐0.39), quetiapine (SMD=0.25, 95% CI: 0.12‐0.38), aripiprazole (SMD=0.16, 95% CI: 0.04‐0.28) and risperidone (SMD=0.12, 95% CI: 0.03‐0.21). The 95% CIs for olanzapine versus aripiprazole and risperidone included the possibility of trivial effects. The differences between olanzapine and lurasidone, amisulpride, perphenazine, clozapine and zotepine were either small or uncertain. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses and in line with other efficacy outcomes and all‐cause discontinuation. Concerning weight gain, the impact of olanzapine was higher than all other antipsychotics, with a mean difference ranging from –4.58 kg (95% CI: –5.33 to –3.83) compared to ziprasidone to –2.30 kg (95% CI: –3.35 to –1.25) compared to amisulpride. Our data suggest that olanzapine is more efficacious than a number of other antipsychotic drugs in the longer term, but its efficacy must be weighed against its side effect profile.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Pshychiatric Mental Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3