Moral foundations and future pro‐environmental lifestyles choices in the Finnish population

Author:

Silfver Mia1ORCID,Niva Mari2,Salmivaara Laura3,Vainio Annukka34

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Social Psychology University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

2. Department of Economics and Management, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

3. Department of Forest Sciences, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

4. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Helsinki Finland

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the study was to examine citizens' perceptions of their preferred pro‐environmental lifestyle choices in the future. We examined how these choices relate to different socio‐demographic factors and moral foundations in a Finnish population survey sample (N = 1,020). Consistent with previous research, endorsing care and fairness foundations related positively to using plant‐based food and local and natural food, as well as using sustainable energy, materials, housing and transportation solutions. However, also endorsing binding moral foundations, loyalty, authority and sanctity, related positively to using local and natural food and to using an electric car or biofuels. Most pro‐environmental practices were related to being a woman, younger age and having higher education, but preferred choices differed according to living environment (urban or rural). We conclude that different pro‐environmental choices are appealing to different socio‐demographic groups with different moral views. Promoting different ways of contributing to ecologically sustainable future could be a way to reach different societal groups. In addition, re‐framing more sustainable practices, such as plant‐based diets, could contribute to such practices becoming a feasible option for more diverse groups. Individuals' preferred future lifestyles are those that align with their moral views, and therefore policymakers should embrace this (moral) diversity in the design of future policies.

Funder

HELSUS Kestävyystieteen Instituutti

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3